- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:59:44 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4709
jmdyck@ibiblio.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
------- Comment #3 from jmdyck@ibiblio.org 2008-02-16 06:59 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> [4b] No change. FTTF believes that the note is accurate.
I don't think that answers my concern. Do you agree and intend that it's a
license for a Full-Text processor to behave non-conformantly? Is a processor
required to answer correctly or not?
Is this the kind of Note that's a not-immediately-obvious consequence of some
normative statements? If so, which ones?
Received on Saturday, 16 February 2008 06:59:53 UTC