- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 01:35:24 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5596 ------- Comment #1 from jmdyck@ibiblio.org 2008-04-26 01:35 ------- As I understand it, the rules of FS 7.2.5 are complete, and consistent with F+O 15.5.6, they just aren't as precise as they could be in the case where the argument's static type is empty. So unless that lack of precision causes serious problems, I don't think I can process this as an erratum. (Note that an implementation is free to infer the more precise type under FS 6.1.1 Static Typing Extensions.)
Received on Saturday, 26 April 2008 01:35:56 UTC