- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:00:36 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5617 ------- Comment #6 from mike@saxonica.com 2008-04-22 18:00 ------- Regarding comment #5: no, I disagree. An implementation of a function is always allowed to return a value that is an instance of a subtype of the declared return type if it chooses. That's a general rule, it's nothing specific to these two operators. (I agree there is room for debate about whether we currently say clearly what the general rule is here; but that doesn't belong as part of this bug.) The proposed text is being drafted as erratum E23.
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 18:01:14 UTC