W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > April 2008

[Bug 5646] fn:put() is underspecified

From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:04:05 +0000
CC:
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1JnxYr-0003ih-Sw@farnsworth.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5646





------- Comment #2 from mike@saxonica.com  2008-04-21 15:04 -------
Thanks for the reference to bug #5314 - I felt sure these issues had been
raised before but failed to locate the bug.

To be more specific, I am having a correspondence with a user who is expecting
to use fn:put() in a context where an updating expression is expected, and
argues this is legal on the grounds that the semantics are
implementation-defined, and this is a semantic rule. I think that if the WG had
intended to allow this then it would have said so. On the other hand, I find it
hard to think of any reason why the WG would have not wanted to do this. This
function sticks out like a sore thumb, it clearly hasn't been thought through.
And there don't appear to be any test cases for it.
Received on Monday, 21 April 2008 15:05:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:22 UTC