- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 04:30:10 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5647
Summary: [XQuery] Default collection
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Recommendation
Platform: PC
URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XQuery
AssignedTo: chamberl@almaden.ibm.com
ReportedBy: mukul_gandhi@yahoo.com
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
In the XQuery 1.0 specification, at http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/
It's mentioned in section: "2.1.1 Static Context", the following point:
Statically known default collection type. This is the type of the sequence of
nodes that would result from calling the fn:collection function with no
arguments. Unless initialized to some other value by an implementation, the
value of statically known default collection type is node()*.
Then in section, "2.4.4 Input Sources", it's mentioned:
The fn:collection function with zero arguments returns the default collection,
an implementation-dependent sequence of nodes.
My question is:
What practical criterias can implementation consider, when returning non-null
values from fn:collection function?
Should we not have simply said, nothing is returned (or, void) when
fn:collection function is called with no arguments?
Regards,
Mukul
Received on Saturday, 19 April 2008 04:30:44 UTC