- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:48:36 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
------- Comment #3 from zongaro@ca.ibm.com 2008-03-31 13:48 ------- I believe the intent was that the descriptions of the effects of the serialization parameters on the xhtml output method should be as defined in the various subsections of section 6 of the recommendation. In many cases, the effect of the parameter is identical to that of the xml output method, and in those cases the recommendation refers back to the definition provided for the xml output method. In the case of the indent parameter, there is no reference back to the definition of the effect of the indent parameter on the xml output method. I take that as a signal that the effect of the indent parameter on the xml output method has no bearing. Regarding the serialization of an element like foo:br, the second paragraph of section 6 says, "It is not an error if the instance of the data model is invalid XHTML." The recommendation allows for the possibility that a user might be mixing xhtml with ordinary xml for their own purposesn - perhaps sending it through some post-processing phase. An HTML user agent is unlikely to do anything useful with that in terms of presentation, so the recommendation leaves it entirely up to the serializer how it should be serialized, so long as it meets the requirements of the recommendation. This is my personal response, not that of the XSL or XQuery working groups.
Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 09:59:06 UTC