http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5002 mukul_gandhi@yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mukul_gandhi@yahoo.com ------- Comment #2 from mukul_gandhi@yahoo.com 2007-09-09 14:16 ------- Hi Mike, Thanks for your response. Please find below my further comments on this topic. The XDM spec states (in section, 2.1 Terminology): 1) Every node is one of the seven kinds of nodes defined in 6 Nodes. Nodes form a tree that consists of a root node plus all the nodes that are reachable directly or indirectly from the root node via the dm:children, dm:attributes, and dm:namespace-nodes accessors. 2) A tree whose root node is a Document Node is referred to as a document. 3) A tree whose root node is not a Document Node is referred to as a fragment. I think the "root node" concept in XDM is fine, and this terminology can coexist with 7 kinds of nodes possible in XDM (which are presently defined). But I suggest adding following definitions to the section, 2.1 Terminology. A tree is a logical structure which is constructed from the nodes, which represent a document or a fragment. The root node of the tree, is it's top most node, which could be a document node, or it can be the root node of a fragment. This will define the concept of root node unambiguously. Regards, MukulReceived on Sunday, 9 September 2007 14:16:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:20 UTC