- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:25:49 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4418 Summary: [XQuery] cyclic module imports Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Recommendation Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XQuery AssignedTo: chamberl@almaden.ibm.com ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org At a late stage in the development of XQuery 1.0 (in fact, at the PR stage) a new rule was introduced (see 4.11): It is a static error [err:XQST0093] to import a module M1 if there exists a sequence of modules M1 ... Mi ... M1 such that each module directly depends on the next module in the sequence The definition of "directly depends" means that a dependency only exists if the importing module actually uses a variable or function in the imported module. The published spec also retains the older rule (also in 4.11): A module may import its own target namespace (this is interpreted as importing an implementation-defined set of other modules that share its target namespace.) However, it is a static error [err:XQST0073] if the graph of module imports contains a cycle (that is, if there exists a sequence of modules M1 ... Mn such that each Mi imports Mi+1 and Mn imports M1), unless all the modules in the cycle share a common namespace. The cumulative effect of these rules is that a cycle of imports is permitted in one case only: where two modules share the same namespace but where at least one of the imports is redundant, that is, a module imports another but does not reference anything in the imported module. It seems unnecessarily onerous on implementations, and unhelpful to users, to permit cyclic imports in one situation only, that being a situation where it achieves nothing. I would propose banning all cyclic imports in XQuery 1.0, and removing all restrictions in XQuery 1.1. (In Saxon, incidentally, I currently enforce the restrictions as described in the Rec, but because previous versions of both the product and the spec were more liberal I have a user option to remove all restrictions on cyclic imports and forwards references. There is no conceptual difficulty in doing this; the limitations were introduced at the last minute only because of bugs in the formal semantics.)
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 10:29:00 UTC