- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:06:59 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4372 ------- Comment #6 from davidc@nag.co.uk 2007-03-16 10:06 ------- I'd strongly argue that the HTML serialisation should not enforce particular PUBLIC ID values, certainly that would be a potentially breaking change not a fix for an erratum. But even if compatibility with the existing practice was not a concern I would still think that this would be a bad idea. The FPI is (was) _intended_ to be locally adapted, There have been dozens of HTML FPI published (and probably many more not published) see for example http://dbaron.org/mozilla/doctypes for one list. At most the HTML method could check that the value matches the FPI syntax http://www.oasis-open.org/cover/tauber-fpi.html, but I think that a consistent thing to do is just check the (simpler) XML rule even in the html case. David
Received on Friday, 16 March 2007 10:07:08 UTC