- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:15:34 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4272
chrisfer@us.ibm.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Comment #8 from chrisfer@us.ibm.com 2007-03-14 18:15 -------
[14:06] scribe: Topic: Issue 4072
[14:07] cferris:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0103.html
[14:08] cferris: relates to http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4072
[14:08] scribe: Daniel: This proposal address the remainder of the existing
Issue.
[14:09] scribe: General text on policy references weren't relevant to assertion
design. Recognized however, best practice exists for attachments. Semantics
don't have dependency on attachment mechanism used.
[14:09] *** ArnaudM has signed off IRC (Quit: CGI:IRC (EOF)).
[14:10] scribe: Rewrote Section 4.1 and added Best Practice.
[14:10] fhirsch3: q+
[14:11] * Zakim sees fhirsch on the speaker queue
[14:12] fhirsch3: q-
[14:12] * Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue
[14:13] scribe: RESOLUTION: Issue 4072 as revised proposal in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Mar/0103.html
[14:14] cferris: rrsagent, where am i?
[14:14] RRSAgent: See http://www.w3.org/2007/03/14-ws-policy-irc#T18-14-48
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 18:15:41 UTC