- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:47:51 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4231 ------- Comment #3 from mike@saxonica.com 2007-01-16 12:47 ------- I think the meaning of "underflow" in terms of numerical arithmetic is well known and the F+O spec is clearly using the term in the general sense of IEEE 754. It means an operation that produces a result which is so close to zero that it cannot be accurately represented. See for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arithmetic_underflow The term is generally used in connection with floating point arithmetic, where it means that the exponent is smaller (closer to minus infinity) than the smallest exponent allowed. It's moot what the F+O spec means when it uses the term in relation to xs:decimal arithmetic. I think the reasoning is simply that some implementations of xs:decimal might use a floating decimal point and might therefore be subject to underflow conditions.
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2007 12:48:03 UTC