- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:10:12 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4231
frans.englich@telia.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com |frans.englich@telia.com
------- Comment #1 from frans.englich@telia.com 2007-01-16 12:10 -------
I don't see what makes General Decimal Arithmetic Specification a valid
reference in this context. Feel free to explain that for me.
I base the test on XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators, 6.2
Operators on Numeric Values, which says: "For xs:decimal operations, overflow
behavior ·must· raise an error [err:FOAR0002]. On underflow, 0.0 must be
returned."
Your comment on how a "negative" decimal is parsed sounds sensible; it makes me
conclude that underflow can never happen with numeric literals, and that
therefore the the valid baselines should be 1) the same as the input; and 2)
FOAR0002.
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2007 12:10:17 UTC