- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:02:27 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4231 Summary: K2-Literals-7 Product: XML Query Test Suite Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XML Query Test Suite AssignedTo: andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com ReportedBy: tim@cbcl.co.uk QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org This test aims to catch underflow in xs:decimal with an expected result of 0.0. Underflow is defined in: http://www2.hursley.ibm.com/decimal/daexcep.html as: "This occurs and signals underflow if a result is inexact and the adjusted exponent of the result would be smaller (more negative) than the smallest value that can be handled by the implementation (the value Emin). That is, the result is both inexact and subnormal." If I understand this correctly, underflow will occur for numbers very close to zero, not numbers which are large negative values. Therefore a suitable number for this test might be: 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 Note also that due to the EBNF for decimal literals: 142] DecimalLiteral ::= ("." Digits) | (Digits "." [0-9]*) this parses as: -(9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999.1) i.e. operator unary minus applied to a large (possibly overflowing) decimal. (:*******************************************************:) (: Test: K2-Literals-7 :) (: Written by: Frans Englich :) (: Date: 2007-01-12T16:19:57+01:00 :) (: Purpose: Use a relatively small xs:decimal literal. :) (:*******************************************************:) -9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999.1
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2007 10:02:38 UTC