- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:13:50 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4170
martin@x-hive.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |martin@x-hive.com
------- Comment #6 from martin@x-hive.com 2007-01-11 08:13 -------
> Can I suggest that you either allow the processing instruction's identity to
> change in this case (and deal with all the possible variable value fix-ups), or
> don't allow processing instructions to be renamed at all.
If your implementation fixes all the variables and other corner cases, it
should be unobservable to the user if the node identity change, shouldn't it?
In that case you're certainly conformant to the spec - in my understanding it
doesn't require your internal node id to be equal, but rather 'node is node2'
to be true, so if you can ensure that it's no problem.
Received on Thursday, 11 January 2007 08:14:14 UTC