[Bug 4168] Atomicity is a problem for a non-transacted implementation

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4168





------- Comment #1 from mike@saxonica.com  2007-01-09 21:05 -------
Perhaps the spec needs to say somehow that atomicity is guaranteed in the event
of application errors (errors that are defined in the language semantics) but
not in the event of a failure of the technical infrastructure on which the
processor is dependent?

Received on Tuesday, 9 January 2007 21:05:49 UTC