- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:08:59 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4273 ------- Comment #4 from simeon@us.ibm.com 2007-02-21 00:08 ------- Michael, I am not sure I fully follow your response. The type in this case is already untyped data. However, I think the example that Tim pointed out shows a problem with type soundness which may break notably some optimizers which rely on the fact that the static type is consistent with the dynamic type, which it isn't here. Do you disagree that there is a problem? or disagree with the stated solution? Thanks, - Jerome
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 00:09:07 UTC