- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:53:46 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4271 ------- Comment #1 from simeon@us.ibm.com 2007-02-20 00:53 ------- Tim, This is a personal answer to this. Even though () + "a string" could be returning () in some implementations. I would think it makes sense to return a static type error for such cases. One reason is that it seems natural to me for a statically-typed implementation to warn the user about it. A stronger technical reason is that some implementation may indeed return a type error and that you want the static type system to prevent that at compile time. - Jerome
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 00:53:54 UTC