- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:41:20 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5323 jim.melton@acm.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED ------- Comment #7 from jim.melton@acm.org 2007-12-18 22:41 ------- In http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5323#c5, Mike Kay said: Section 3.1.4 of the XQueryX Recommendation unfortunately links to http://www.w3.org/2005/qt-applets/xqueryApplet.html Reopening as it seems this is an error in the spec. Good catch, Mike. It's not completely clear what to do about this. Obviously, we can issue an Erratum that replaces that link with a link to the version of the Applet that was current when the XQuery spec went to Recommendation status, but is that the right thing to do? Another choice is to issue an Erratum that replaces the link with one to the version of the Applet that Andrew identified. But is that the right thing? After all, that link might be invalid in another week or month or quarter. Ideally, wouldn't it be great if we had a single URI that always pointed to the "latest" version 1.0 Applet? Is this the right approach, or would it be better to issue and re-issue Errata to update the Applet links every time the Applet is updated?
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2007 22:41:26 UTC