- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:39:08 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4487 ------- Comment #3 from mike@saxonica.com 2007-04-27 11:39 ------- >I don't understand why this situation is any different to having an attribute with a namespace prefix that cannot be used It isn't any different, that's the whole point. In both cases, namespace fixup should ensure that the data model is correct and consistent. The only difference is that we already have constraints saying that if the attribute has a prefix then the prefix must be in-scope on the containing element; we don't currently have a constraint saying that if it has a URI then it must have a prefix.
Received on Friday, 27 April 2007 11:39:12 UTC