- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 12:13:49 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4441 ------- Comment #4 from martin@x-hive.com 2007-04-01 12:13 ------- It's probably even valid to treat anything that returns 'empty-sequence()' as a function with possible side-affects - why would you call it otherwise?
Received on Sunday, 1 April 2007 12:13:59 UTC