Re: [Bug 3698] [FT] Interaction between FTDiacriticsOption and collation unclear

Jochen,
 
The row 3 and 4 (for with+without diacritics) should be dropped.
Instead add the following sentence after the table and the Note:

For options "with diacritics" and "without diacritics" however only
tokens are
considered that contain, respectively, do not contain characters with
diacritical marks.

>>I would prefer to preserve the table. I think it is misleading to say
"the underlying
>>comparison is the same as for "diacritics insensitive", it might be
the first comparison depending on how it is handled.
>>Instead maybe?
>>With
>>compare base character, match where diacritics are present (in the
first two columns)
>>diacritics-sensitive variant of CDI if it exists, else error (in the
3rd column)
>>Without
>>compare base character, match where diacritics are not present (in
the first two columns)
>>diacritics-sensitive variant of CDI if it exists, else error (in the
3rd column)

Pat


>>> <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org> 10/13/06 7:25 AM >>>


http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3698





------- Comment #1 from doerre@de.ibm.com  2006-10-13 11:25 -------
Here is my proposal to fix the matrix.

1. UCC/"insensitive" should read:
compare base characters only, disregarding diacritics

The row 3 and 4 (for with+without diacritics) should be dropped.
Instead add the following sentence after the table and the Note:

For options "with diacritics" and "without diacritics" the underlying
comparison is the same as for "diacritics insensitive", however only
tokens are
considered that contain, respectively, do not contain characters with
diacritical marks.

I hope this improves it.

/Jochen