- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:17:16 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1705 ------- Comment #18 from mike@saxonica.com 2006-10-17 21:17 ------- The WG spent a long time this evening discussing this bug, without coming to a conclusion. We did come up with a draft definition of "circularity", and on this definition, your example is not a circularity; moreover, I and I think several others on the WG believe that this query is legal. I think we're going to discuss it among ourselves for a few days and will respond further when we've decided we know what we are talking about - there have been too many factually incorrect responses on this thread already!
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 21:17:18 UTC