- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:50:27 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3844 ------- Comment #1 from mike@saxonica.com 2006-10-17 19:50 ------- It occurs to me that my making all these changes to accommodate static typing, the test suite is becoming less effective at testing dynamic typing. A dynamic typing implementation will typically work out for itself that it needs to add an exactly-one() test to the expression tree, and if it's already been added "by hand" then there's a path in my product that is no longer being tested. So I don't think it's a good idea to change all the tests as is being requested. I'd like some of them to stay as is, and to be marked in the catalog as failing under static typing.
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 19:50:41 UTC