- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:26:01 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3760 ------- Comment #3 from simeon@us.ibm.com 2006-10-16 18:26 ------- sigh... seems my previous post didn't get through. so here it is again. I meant to say one place as either normalization or dynamic evaluation. We could remove it from one or the others, and I think there could be arguments both ways. But as far as I know, fs:() functions are usually introduced through normalization so that might make it more consistent with other parts of the spec. also, all of the other constructors introduce those functions at normalization time so that is a much bigger change. I recommend that we close that bug by removing the fs:item-sequence-to-node-sequence(...) call from either the normalization or the dynamic semantics. And leave the choice about which one of those should be removed to editorial discretion. - Jerome
Received on Monday, 16 October 2006 18:26:19 UTC