- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 22:14:13 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3838 ------- Comment #1 from mike@saxonica.com 2006-10-15 22:14 ------- There are of course use cases for such an enhancement, but this is not the time to be considering enhancements. There are also considerable technical complications in allowing the string data type to use a wider character set than XML permits. For example, it would require a careful look at the rules for regular expressions. There's also a potentially significant performance penalty if characters in a string have to be checked for XML-validity at the time text or attribute nodes are constructed, rather than at the time the string is constructed. Apart from that, the XML working group chose consciously to disallow certain characters, and we should respect that decision unless there are very compelling reasons. Sometimes it's more important to be consistent than to be right. The XPath data model should have XML as its foundation.
Received on Sunday, 15 October 2006 22:14:19 UTC