- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 23:41:55 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3823 ------- Comment #6 from nick@cbcl.co.uk 2006-10-13 23:41 ------- (In reply to comment #5) Ah, sorry, when I said LHS and RHS what I actually meant was the actual and expected type parameters of the created fs:convert-operand expression. Replacing eq with =, or moving the check to the test harness both sound equally good to me.
Received on Friday, 13 October 2006 23:42:07 UTC