- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:05:22 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3750
jim.melton@acm.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Comment #1 from jim.melton@acm.org 2006-10-12 22:05 -------
I'm uncertain what the test suite has to do with the need for the fts
namespace. Do we expect that the functions that appear in the spec will be
(normatively) provided by implementations? If not, then I don't understand why
the namespace has to be grounded. Isn't it analogous to the fs namespace in
Formal Semantics? (Or am I missing something really obvious?)
Received on Thursday, 12 October 2006 22:05:33 UTC