- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 15:31:21 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3784 ------- Comment #1 from simeon@us.ibm.com 2006-10-03 15:31 ------- This is a good remark. I think that function never got the attention it deserved on the static typing front. However, this is really late in the process to change this, especially that it requires changes to two documents (F&O will have to point to static typing rules, the FS will have to invent new static typing rules). Personally, I think this issue could be dealt with by implementation using a static typing extension for that version. The static typing extension should provide enough flexibility to do this. - Jerome
Received on Tuesday, 3 October 2006 15:31:32 UTC