- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 19:37:33 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3161 klaus.bosse@web.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Comment #7 from klaus.bosse@web.de 2006-05-09 19:37 ------- [XPath]and[DM] I agree with your suggestion in the first Point ([XPath] Section 2.5.2). This sets the focus on the flexibility of implementations and not on the asymmetric relation between string-value and typed-value, but this is ok here. I see now that in [DM] Section 3.3.1.3 the first sentence is correct because it says "typed-value and string-value properties" (and not only "typed-value and string-value") as you emphasized. But I would prefer here a note like for string-values ("If an implementation stores only the string-value of a node, the following considerations apply:...") which says, that the relation between string-values and typed-values is not symmetric, because this can not be obvious to the reader (me) at this point of the document (--> [DM]6.2.4 typed-value). But, ok, this is no tutorial. So I reopen the bug but if you will close it you will see no protest. Regards Klaus Bosse
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 19:37:40 UTC