- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:26:48 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
simeon@us.ibm.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Comment #1 from simeon@us.ibm.com 2006-03-30 00:26 -------
No, Expr3 should definitely be type-checked. This is already fixed by the
refactoring of the typing rules for function calls.
Closed with no change to the document.
- Jerome
Received on Thursday, 30 March 2006 00:26:54 UTC