[Bug 2999] typeswitch: how to handle case clauses specifying the same type

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2999


frans.englich@telia.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED




------- Comment #4 from frans.englich@telia.com  2006-03-16 13:42 -------

I, as probably many others, doesn't like how the language turns out in this
area, but I think it's (unfortunately) the best solution given the practical
circumstances, as explained in motivation of the resolution.

However, I think that it still can be improved editorially, see new bug report
#3011[1].

I am satisfied with the resolution of this bug report and therefore change its
status to CLOSED.

(btw, I would consider element() and element(*) identical, because "2.5.4.3
Element Test" says "1. element() and element(*) match any single element node,
regardless of its name or type annotation.")


Regards,
Frans

1.
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3011

Received on Thursday, 16 March 2006 13:42:38 UTC