- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 23:29:01 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2732
bjoern@hoehrmann.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|LATER |
------- Additional Comments From bjoern@hoehrmann.de 2006-03-04 23:29 -------
Is comment #1 supposed to formally address this issue? I never heard of this
response and found it only by accident. Is there publicly archived evidence
that the Working Groups actually sent the response to me? In that case I would
appreciate a pointer so I can figure out what's wrong with my mail setup.
The response is not acceptable to me, I did not ask whether the Working Group
could easily make this change, but that it makes this change. As I pointed out,
my implementation experience is that the current design is not suitable for a
number of important use cases, and it is not clear to me that it would be
reasonable to assume that making this change would invalidate an individuals
review or implementation experience. Therefore, the Working Group would need to
come up with a more technically sound response for me to withdraw the issue.
Received on Saturday, 4 March 2006 23:29:07 UTC