- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:49:09 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2461 jonathan.robie@datadirect.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[XQuery] Data model |[XQuery] Data model |conformance |conformance ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.robie@datadirect.com 2006-01-31 19:49 ------- An XML processor creates either a PSVI or an Infoset, so these conformance claims make it fairly straightforward to say that two processors create the same Data Model instance from an XML document represented as a stream of characters. I find this useful. If you use an API such as JDOM, then I agree that there is wiggle room - we do not have conformance claims for DOM, JDOM, etc. And the standard APIs are not typed, so only the Infoset mapping would really apply. For a type-aware DOM, such as the one in Xerces, you could define a PSVI mapping. I believe we should retain the conformance claims for the Infoset and PSVI mappings. The fact that there is no standard mapping from the XML APIs to an Infoset or PSVI does not mean these are not useful. XML documents are an important case.
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2006 19:49:18 UTC