- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 19:11:21 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2634 ------- Additional Comments From mrys@microsoft.com 2006-01-03 19:11 ------- For all the path comparisons and node name tests it certainly should be codepoint based (otherwise we will get a completely different, harder to understand language). For xs:QName, I would prefer also that we do not fall back to the default collation but do code point. Where does it say that we use default collation?
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2006 19:11:29 UTC