- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 21:31:31 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1798 ------- Comment #2 from jmdyck@ibiblio.org 2006-04-24 21:31 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Fixed as suggested, except for the Gregorian case, left as is for consistency > with the XQuery 1.0 specification. If you want to be consistent with the XQuery spec, why did you expand the 'numeric' rows?
Received on Monday, 24 April 2006 21:31:38 UTC