- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:20:46 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3097 ------- Comment #6 from jonathan.robie@datadirect.com 2006-04-24 19:20 ------- > The prevalent sentiment was that error > behavior would in many, if not most, cases be implementation specific. Also, > error behavior would not be a criterion for interop compatibility. I was surprised by these two sentences in your response. I just reviewed the meeting minutes, in which we agreed (without objection) to close the issue without change. But there is nothing in the minutes to say that we believe that error behavior is, in most cases, implementation specific, and I am not sure how freely to interpret this comment. Our test suite *does* test for error conditions. I think the part that is implementation-dependent involves the case where more than one error applies, in which case I believe the prevailing sentiment was that an implementation could choose which of these errors to raise. We decided that was not part of this issue, but a different issue which could be raised separately.
Received on Monday, 24 April 2006 19:21:39 UTC