- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:41:21 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3032 ------- Comment #2 from mike@saxonica.com 2006-04-24 17:41 ------- This seems a radical change: it means that we set the is-id property on an element (but not an attribute) that has a list type with an item type of xs:ID, or a union type with a member type of xs:ID. Is that what you intended, and if so, could you explain why?
Received on Monday, 24 April 2006 17:41:25 UTC