- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:47:23 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2776 holstege@mathling.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Comment #1 from holstege@mathling.com 2006-04-24 15:47 ------- The dangling forward reference still exists in the latest draft and the requirement that weights be literals also still exists in the latest draft. If the WG decided to keep weights as literals we would appreciate a rationale (and the bug should be more properly marked as WONTFIX), but in any case the editorial part of this comment needs to be addressed.
Received on Monday, 24 April 2006 15:47:25 UTC