- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:47:23 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2776
holstege@mathling.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
------- Comment #1 from holstege@mathling.com 2006-04-24 15:47 -------
The dangling forward reference still exists in the latest draft
and the requirement that weights be literals also still exists in
the latest draft. If the WG decided to keep weights as literals
we would appreciate a rationale (and the bug should be more properly
marked as WONTFIX), but in any case the editorial part of this
comment needs to be addressed.
Received on Monday, 24 April 2006 15:47:25 UTC