- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:11:10 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3085 ------- Comment #4 from simeon@us.ibm.com 2006-04-17 15:11 ------- My understanding of the issue is the same as Michael Kay's. I believe the specs are the way they are by design. I actually do not believe there is a contradiction. The static typing rules are clearly sound, although not the most accurate you could write. I believe each of the proposed rules (more precise, as in the spec, or more restrictive as Jens suggests) would work. I would have a personal preference for Jens's suggestion, however, changing the rules at this point may be a problem for some implementations. - Jerome
Received on Monday, 17 April 2006 15:11:21 UTC