- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 05:44:20 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1781
------- Comment #2 from jmdyck@ibiblio.org 2006-04-11 05:44 -------
Given the production
AtomicTypeName ::= QName
it's probably a bad idea to say/think that AtomicTypeName "directly derives
from" QName. In terms of language theory, it's the other way round:
AtomicTypeName directly derives QName.
But if you mean that you replaced the above production with
AtomicTypeName ::= TypeName
then yeah, I think that will work.
Received on Tuesday, 11 April 2006 05:44:29 UTC