W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > September 2005

[Bug 2287] [xqueryx] forclause and letclause

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:30:51 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1EKukd-0007kv-Ax@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2287


jim.melton@acm.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




------- Additional Comments From jim.melton@acm.org  2005-09-29 09:30 -------
The Working Group discussed this comment and explored several factors.  We
finally concluded that we do not wish to limit the "coding style" that XQueryX
generators are permitted to use.  While recognizing that the two styles are
semantically equivalent, we also recognize that the authors of some XQueryX
generators will prefer to use the comma-separated style and others to use the
for-separated style.  Thus, the WG declines to adopt the proposed change. 

Please let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by adding a
comment to the issue record and changing the Status of the issue to Closed. Or,
if you do not agree with this resolution, please add a comment explaining why.
If you wish to appeal the WG's decision to the Director, then also change the
Status of the record to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not
wish to appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the
record to Closed. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will
assume you agree with the WG decision.
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2005 09:30:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:08 UTC