W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > September 2005

[Bug 2259] [xqueryx] xqx:constructorFunctionExpr

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:13:49 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1EKuU9-0006Od-Br@wiggum.w3.org>


jim.melton@acm.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

------- Additional Comments From jim.melton@acm.org  2005-09-29 09:13 -------
The Working Group has discussed this comment extensively.  At the end of the
discussion, the participants unanimously agreed that the finer granularity of
distinctions offered by keeping xqx:constructorFunctionExpr and
xqx:functionCallExpr distinct overshadows any simplifications that might be seen
by any particular implementation of XQueryX.  XQueryX generators that choose to
generate xqx:functionCallExpr elements instead of xqx:constructorFunctionExpr
will not be deemed nonconforming for that reasons, but other XQueryX generators
may make the opposite choice in order to better capture the semantics of the
query they are composing. 

Consequently, we determined that the bug will be marked WONTFIX. 

Please let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by adding a
comment to the issue record and changing the Status of the issue to Closed. Or,
if you do not agree with this resolution, please add a comment explaining why.
If you wish to appeal the WG's decision to the Director, then also change the
Status of the record to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not
wish to appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the
record to Closed. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will
assume you agree with the WG decision.
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2005 09:14:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:08 UTC