- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:13:49 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2259 jim.melton@acm.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From jim.melton@acm.org 2005-09-29 09:13 ------- The Working Group has discussed this comment extensively. At the end of the discussion, the participants unanimously agreed that the finer granularity of distinctions offered by keeping xqx:constructorFunctionExpr and xqx:functionCallExpr distinct overshadows any simplifications that might be seen by any particular implementation of XQueryX. XQueryX generators that choose to generate xqx:functionCallExpr elements instead of xqx:constructorFunctionExpr will not be deemed nonconforming for that reasons, but other XQueryX generators may make the opposite choice in order to better capture the semantics of the query they are composing. Consequently, we determined that the bug will be marked WONTFIX. Please let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of the issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the record to Closed. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will assume you agree with the WG decision.
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2005 09:14:02 UTC