[Bug 1896] Consistency between date/time overflow and numeric overflow from bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org on 2005-09-27 (public-qt-comments@w3.org from September 2005)

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:35:37 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1EKHUX-0007St-KV@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1896


ashok.malhotra@oracle.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Additional Comments From ashok.malhotra@oracle.com  2005-09-27 15:35 -------
The WGs decided on 9/27 to fix this bug by adopting Don Chamberlin's
recommendation: "...in casting 
from a string to a date/time/duration it is also possible that the value is too 
big/small to represent. The current F&O spec treats this as FORG0001, "Invalid 
value for cast/constructor". For consistency, should we change the error code 
for this condition to FODT0001 ("Overflow in date/time arithmetic") or FODT0002 
("Overflow in duration arithmetic")?"

Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2005 15:40:44 UTC