- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:50:33 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2269 ------- Additional Comments From mike@saxonica.com 2005-09-20 13:50 ------- An XSLT 2.0 processor never executes the xsl:fallback child of an xsl:analyze-string or xsl:for-each-group instruction (even in backwards compatibility mode), so the 2.0 spec doesn't need to say what should happen if it does. It's up to the 1.0 spec to define what an XSLT 1.0 processor does. I agree that editorially, it might be clearer to remove xsl:matching-substring and xsl:non-matching-substring from the second row of the table, and put xsl:analyze-string there instead. But there's no substantive difference. Michael Kay (personal response)
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2005 13:51:17 UTC