- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:56:14 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2261
jim.melton@acm.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From jim.melton@acm.org 2005-09-20 11:56 -------
Thanks for your comment. This is, I believe, a matter of philosophy. Should
the XQueryX spec (including schema and stylesheet) be designed to prevent the
use of XQueryX constructs that translate into invalid, useless, or merely
ignorant XQuery syntax? Well, we've tried to accomplish some minimal level of
that kind of prevention, but have (so far) taken the approach that any XQueryX
document that transforms into invalid XQuery (syntactically or semantically) has
undefined semantics.
Nonetheless, we will take a closer look at this philosophical direction and see
what changes might be appropriate.
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2005 11:56:24 UTC