- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 10:05:14 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2259
jim.melton@acm.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From jim.melton@acm.org 2005-09-20 10:05 -------
Thanks for your report and discussion. As you infer,
xwx:constructorFunctionExpr is syntactically equivalent to a one-argument
xqx:functionCallExpr. Semantically, it is slightly different, at least in the
correspondence to XQuery expressions. Constructors there are function-like in
appearance, but behave more like casts.
We will discuss your suggestion (that xqx:constructorFunctionExpr is unnecessary
and can be replaced with xqx:functionCallExpr). In all frankness, I personally
feel that the semantic distinction (even if only mental) justifies having two
different elements.
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2005 10:05:23 UTC