- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:08:31 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1897 ------- Additional Comments From mike@saxonica.com 2005-09-16 11:08 ------- The Working Group discussed this and agreed it ought to be fixed, and asked the editor to propose the detailed revision. Subject to confirmation by the WG, I propose the following. (a) to align with doc-available(), the first argument of unparsed-text-available() will accept an empty sequence, and will return false in this case. (b) we normally adopt a principle that where a value is optional, then it ought to be possible to specify an explicit value whose effect is equivalent to defaulting it. Applying this principle, I propose that if the second argumnent of unparsed-text-available() is an empty sequence, the effect should be the same as calling the one-argument version of the function. [There are counter-examples. We don't allow an empty sequence as the third argument of substring(), for example. However, it's not a big issue either way, and this seems a reasonable approach.] Michael Kay
Received on Friday, 16 September 2005 11:08:53 UTC