- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:53:26 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2149 ------- Additional Comments From fred.zemke@oracle.com 2005-09-15 00:53 ------- I agree that it is better not to define something normatively twice, so if you can get a statement in XPath 2.0 about what its stability requirements are, great. I assume that then you could and would put an explicit hot link or citation in XSLT 2.0 referring the reader to the normative text in XPath 2.0. This leaves the problem of the antecedent for "these values". I still think the third sentence that I cited is ambiguous, meaning either "the subset of XPath features that were explicitly called out in the second sentence is required to be stable during XSLT evaluation" or "all values that XPath requires to be stable, both those listed and those not listed in the second sentence, must be stable during an entire XSLT execution". Since you mean the latter, could you just humor me and change the last sentence to absolutely nail this down, even if you personally don't see a problem? Something like "All values that XPath 2.0 requires to be stable during an XPath evaluation are required to be stable during an XSLT 2.0 evaluation."
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2005 00:53:34 UTC