- From: 'Liam Quin' <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 20:46:09 -0400
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: Scott Hollenbeck <sah@428cobrajet.net>, ietf-types@iana.org, ietf-xml-mime@imc.org, public-qt-comments@w3.org
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:29:26PM +0200, Chris Lilley wrote: > On Thursday, September 8, 2005, 8:48:53 PM, 'Liam wrote: > > LQ> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:12:43PM -0400, Scott Hollenbeck wrote: > >> Thanks, but my point is that you need to put this info in the template > >> itself. > LQ> OK, noted. > > LQ> Note that the information is also elsewhere in the published > LQ> specification -- it's at the beginning of the document -- since > LQ> this Internet Type information is being published as part > LQ> of a larger document. > > LQ> Liam > > Liam, > > this has come up before as W3C uses the new process. The requirement to > make the registration template an appendix in the spec means that people > tend to forget that the appendix also has the be read as an independent > document by the people here. > > The appendix has to make sense as a standalone registrations, so rather > than saying "this document" say "the document at (url) called (title)". Thanks (Chris and Scott and Paul) -- We will publish another round of draft documents very soon, but the set after that will reflect these and any other comments, and yes, will have the URI in it :-) Liam -- Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 00:46:12 UTC