W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > September 2005

Re: W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0

From: 'Liam Quin' <liam@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 20:46:09 -0400
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Cc: Scott Hollenbeck <sah@428cobrajet.net>, ietf-types@iana.org, ietf-xml-mime@imc.org, public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <20050909004609.GU20337@w3.org>

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:29:26PM +0200, Chris Lilley wrote:
> On Thursday, September 8, 2005, 8:48:53 PM, 'Liam wrote:
> 
> LQ> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:12:43PM -0400, Scott Hollenbeck wrote:
> >> Thanks, but my point is that you need to put this info in the template
> >> itself.
> LQ> OK, noted.
> 
> LQ> Note that the information is also elsewhere in the published
> LQ> specification -- it's at the beginning of the document -- since
> LQ> this Internet Type information is being published as part
> LQ> of a larger document.
> 
> LQ> Liam
> 
> Liam,
> 
> this has come up before as W3C uses the new process. The requirement to
> make the registration template an appendix in the spec means that people
> tend to forget that the appendix also has the be read as an independent
> document by the people here.
> 
> The appendix has to make sense as a standalone registrations, so rather
> than saying "this document" say "the document at (url) called (title)".

Thanks (Chris and Scott and Paul) --

We will publish another round of draft documents very soon, but the set
after that will reflect these and any other comments, and yes, will
have the URI in it :-)

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 00:46:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:08 UTC