[Bug 1968] typing for fn:subsequence() too strict


simeon@us.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

------- Additional Comments From simeon@us.ibm.com  2005-09-06 15:49 -------
Yes, this is correct. The rule you mention is wrong, that was picked up
already following the treatment of a previous bug report (#1728).

The WGs have already decided to remove that rule.

Thanks for your feedback,
- Jerome Simeon

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 1728 ***

Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2005 15:49:29 UTC